2000 Nissan Almera vs. 1983 Plymouth Caravelle

To start off, 2000 Nissan Almera is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Plymouth Caravelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Plymouth Caravelle would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Plymouth Caravelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Nissan Almera (109 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1983 Plymouth Caravelle. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Almera should accelerate faster than 1983 Plymouth Caravelle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Nissan Almera weights approximately 315 kg more than 1983 Plymouth Caravelle. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Nissan Almera (244 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Plymouth Caravelle. (158 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2000 Nissan Almera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Plymouth Caravelle.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Nissan Almera 1983 Plymouth Caravelle
Make Nissan Plymouth
Model Almera Caravelle
Year Released 2000 1983
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2184 cc 2213 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 109 HP 96 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 244 Nm 158 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 3200 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Vehicle Weight 1480 kg 1165 kg
Vehicle Length 4270 mm 4760 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1740 mm
Vehicle Height 1610 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2540 mm 2630 mm