2000 Nissan Almera vs. 2011 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2011 Ford Ecosport is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Nissan Almera. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Nissan Almera would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 9 more horse power than 2000 Nissan Almera. (134 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 2000 Nissan Almera.
Because 2011 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Nissan Almera. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 2000 Nissan Almera has manual transmission. 2000 Nissan Almera will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Nissan Almera | 2011 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Nissan | Ford |
| Model | Almera | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2490 mm |
