2000 Nissan Almera vs. 2012 Renault Trafic
To start off, 2012 Renault Trafic is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Nissan Almera. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Nissan Almera would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Nissan Almera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Nissan Almera (109 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2012 Renault Trafic. (100 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Almera should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Trafic.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Nissan Almera (244 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Trafic. (241 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2000 Nissan Almera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Trafic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Nissan Almera | 2012 Renault Trafic | |
Make | Nissan | Renault |
Model | Almera | Trafic |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2184 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 241 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 93 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3100 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 90 L |