2000 Nissan Bluebird vs. 1964 Skoda Felicia
To start off, 2000 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Skoda Felicia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Skoda Felicia would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 280 kg more than 1964 Skoda Felicia.
Because 2000 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Skoda Felicia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Nissan Bluebird | 1964 Skoda Felicia | |
Make | Nissan | Skoda |
Model | Bluebird | Felicia |
Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1089 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 49 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 890 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1390 mm |