2000 Nissan Bluebird vs. 1981 Holden Commodore

To start off, 2000 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 1,892 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 10 kg more than 1981 Holden Commodore.

Because 1981 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Bluebird, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Nissan Bluebird 1981 Holden Commodore
Make Nissan Holden
Model Bluebird Commodore
Year Released 2000 1981
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1499 cc 1892 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 0 HP 78 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Vehicle Weight 1170 kg 1160 kg
Vehicle Length 4480 mm 4710 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1370 mm