2000 Nissan Bluebird vs. 1986 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 2000 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 116 kg more than 1986 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 2000 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Toyota Lite Ace. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Nissan Bluebird | 1986 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Bluebird | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 2000 | 1986 |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1104 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1910 mm |