2000 Nissan Bluebird vs. 1995 Rover MGF
To start off, 2000 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover MGF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover MGF would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Rover MGF is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Rover MGF weights approximately 354 kg more than 2000 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 1995 Rover MGF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Rover MGF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Bluebird, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Nissan Bluebird | 1995 Rover MGF | |
Make | Nissan | Rover |
Model | Bluebird | MGF |
Year Released | 2000 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 145 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1524 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1280 mm |