2000 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2003 Isuzu D-MAX
To start off, 2003 Isuzu D-MAX is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Isuzu D-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Isuzu D-MAX weights approximately 678 kg more than 2000 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 2003 Isuzu D-MAX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Nissan Bluebird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Isuzu D-MAX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Nissan Bluebird | 2003 Isuzu D-MAX | |
| Make | Nissan | Isuzu |
| Model | Bluebird | D-MAX |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 2999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 129 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1848 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1740 mm |
