2000 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2006 Rover 25
To start off, 2006 Rover 25 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 110 kg more than 2006 Rover 25.
Because 2000 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Rover 25. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Nissan Bluebird | 2006 Rover 25 | |
Make | Nissan | Rover |
Model | Bluebird | 25 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |