2000 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2009 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2009 Subaru Outback is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,455 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Nissan Bluebird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Nissan Bluebird | 2009 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Nissan | Subaru |
| Model | Bluebird | Outback |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 2455 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1750 mm |
