2000 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2010 Honda Fit
To start off, 2010 Honda Fit is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 48 kg more than 2010 Honda Fit.
Because 2000 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Honda Fit. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Nissan Bluebird | 2010 Honda Fit | |
Make | Nissan | Honda |
Model | Bluebird | Fit |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1800 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 117 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1152 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4105 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1694 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1524 mm |