2000 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2011 Audi A5
To start off, 2011 Audi A5 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Audi A5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Audi A5 weights approximately 660 kg more than 2000 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 2011 Audi A5 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Nissan Bluebird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi A5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Audi A5 has automatic transmission and 2000 Nissan Bluebird has manual transmission. 2000 Nissan Bluebird will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Audi A5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Nissan Bluebird | 2011 Audi A5 | |
| Make | Nissan | Audi |
| Model | Bluebird | A5 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 211 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1830 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4623 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1852 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1382 mm |
