2000 Nissan Cefiro vs. 1958 Talbot T 26
To start off, 2000 Nissan Cefiro is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Talbot T 26 weights approximately 180 kg more than 2000 Nissan Cefiro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Nissan Cefiro has automatic transmission and 1958 Talbot T 26 has manual transmission. 1958 Talbot T 26 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Nissan Cefiro will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Nissan Cefiro | 1958 Talbot T 26 | |
Make | Nissan | Talbot |
Model | Cefiro | T 26 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1958 |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 4482 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1890 mm |