2000 Nissan Cefiro vs. 1986 Ford Tempo
To start off, 2000 Nissan Cefiro is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Nissan Cefiro weights approximately 325 kg more than 1986 Ford Tempo.
Because 2000 Nissan Cefiro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Nissan Cefiro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Nissan Cefiro | 1986 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Cefiro | Tempo |
Year Released | 2000 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 2307 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1340 mm |