2000 Nissan Cefiro vs. 2013 Mazda CX-5
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-5 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Nissan Cefiro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Nissan Cefiro would be higher. At 2,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Nissan Cefiro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-5 weights approximately 58 kg more than 2000 Nissan Cefiro.
Because 2000 Nissan Cefiro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Nissan Cefiro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Nissan Cefiro | 2013 Mazda CX-5 | |
| Make | Nissan | Mazda |
| Model | Cefiro | CX-5 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 2000 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1488 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4555 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2165 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1710 mm |
