2000 Nissan El Grand vs. 2013 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2013 Honda CR-V is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Nissan El Grand. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Nissan El Grand would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Nissan El Grand is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Nissan El Grand weights approximately 369 kg more than 2013 Honda CR-V.
Because 2013 Honda CR-V is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Nissan El Grand. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 2000 Nissan El Grand has manual transmission. 2000 Nissan El Grand will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Nissan El Grand | 2013 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Nissan | Honda |
| Model | El Grand | CR-V |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Engine Size | 3200 cc | 2354 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 182 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1970 kg | 1601 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1654 mm |
