2000 Nissan Pathfinder vs. 2010 Ford S-Max
To start off, 2010 Ford S-Max is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Nissan Pathfinder. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Nissan Pathfinder would be higher. At 3,274 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Nissan Pathfinder is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford S-Max. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Pathfinder will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Nissan Pathfinder | 2010 Ford S-Max | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Pathfinder | S-Max |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3274 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 202 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |