2000 Nissan Pathfinder vs. 2012 Ford Expedition
To start off, 2012 Ford Expedition is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Nissan Pathfinder. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Nissan Pathfinder would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford Expedition is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Nissan Pathfinder is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Ford Expedition. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Pathfinder will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Ford Expedition has automatic transmission and 2000 Nissan Pathfinder has manual transmission. 2000 Nissan Pathfinder will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Ford Expedition will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Nissan Pathfinder | 2012 Ford Expedition | |
| Make | Nissan | Ford |
| Model | Pathfinder | Expedition |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3274 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 310 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 5621 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2002 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1974 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3327 mm |
