2000 Nissan Sentra vs. 1964 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 2000 Nissan Sentra is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Nissan Sentra (152 HP) has 44 more horse power than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Sentra should accelerate faster than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six.
Because 1964 Reliant Sabre Six is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Sentra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Reliant Sabre Six (185 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Nissan Sentra. (176 Nm). This means 1964 Reliant Sabre Six will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Nissan Sentra.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Nissan Sentra | 1964 Reliant Sabre Six | |
Make | Nissan | Reliant |
Model | Sentra | Sabre Six |
Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1770 cc | 2552 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 176 Nm | 185 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2290 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 38 L |