2000 Nissan Sentra vs. 2010 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2010 Chrysler 300 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Nissan Sentra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Nissan Sentra would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chrysler 300 (360 HP @ 5150 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 2000 Nissan Sentra. (152 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2000 Nissan Sentra.
Because 2010 Chrysler 300 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Nissan Sentra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chrysler 300 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chrysler 300 (527 Nm) has 351 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Nissan Sentra. (176 Nm). This means 2010 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Nissan Sentra.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Nissan Sentra | 2010 Chrysler 300 | |
Make | Nissan | Chrysler |
Model | Sentra | 300 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1770 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 360 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5150 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 527 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4999 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1882 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3048 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 72 L |