2000 Nissan Sentra vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Nissan Sentra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Nissan Sentra would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Matrix (156 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2000 Nissan Sentra. (152 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 2000 Nissan Sentra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Matrix (220 Nm) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Nissan Sentra. (176 Nm). This means 2013 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Nissan Sentra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Nissan Sentra | 2013 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Nissan | Toyota |
| Model | Sentra | Matrix |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1770 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 152 HP | 156 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4365 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1765 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 50 L |
