2000 Nissan Terrano II vs. 2009 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2009 Holden Commodore is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Nissan Terrano II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Nissan Terrano II would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 244 more horse power than 2000 Nissan Terrano II. (116 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2000 Nissan Terrano II.
Because 2000 Nissan Terrano II is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Terrano II will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Nissan Terrano II. (197 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Nissan Terrano II.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Nissan Terrano II | 2009 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Nissan | Holden |
| Model | Terrano II | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2388 cc | 5976 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 360 HP |
| Torque | 197 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
