2000 Noble M12 vs. 1976 Zastava 132
To start off, 2000 Noble M12 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 2,544 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Noble M12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Noble M12 (307 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 1976 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Noble M12 should accelerate faster than 1976 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Zastava 132 weights approximately 115 kg more than 2000 Noble M12.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Noble M12 (435 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 293 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Zastava 132. (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Noble M12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Zastava 132.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Noble M12 | 1976 Zastava 132 | |
Make | Noble | Zastava |
Model | M12 | 132 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1976 |
Engine Size | 2544 cc | 1756 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 307 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 435 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2560 mm |