2000 Oldsmobile Achieva vs. 2011 Tata Nano
To start off, 2011 Tata Nano is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Oldsmobile Achieva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Oldsmobile Achieva would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile Achieva is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Oldsmobile Achieva weights approximately 710 kg more than 2011 Tata Nano.
Because 2011 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Achieva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Oldsmobile Achieva has automatic transmission and 2011 Tata Nano has manual transmission. 2011 Tata Nano will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Oldsmobile Achieva will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Oldsmobile Achieva | 2011 Tata Nano | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Tata |
Model | Achieva | Nano |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2400 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 35 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1495 mm |