2000 Oldsmobile Achieva vs. 2012 BMW M3
To start off, 2012 BMW M3 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Oldsmobile Achieva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Oldsmobile Achieva would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 BMW M3 weights approximately 575 kg more than 2000 Oldsmobile Achieva.
Because 2012 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Achieva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Oldsmobile Achieva has automatic transmission and 2012 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 2012 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Oldsmobile Achieva will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Oldsmobile Achieva | 2012 BMW M3 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | BMW |
Model | Achieva | M3 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2400 cc | 3999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 414 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1885 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4615 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1803 mm |