2000 Oldsmobile Achieva vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Oldsmobile Achieva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Oldsmobile Achieva would be higher. At 2,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XF weights approximately 692 kg more than 2000 Oldsmobile Achieva.
Because 2013 Jaguar XF is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Oldsmobile Achieva. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Oldsmobile Achieva | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Jaguar |
| Model | Achieva | XF |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2400 cc | 2995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 335 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 2002 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2053 mm |
