2000 Oldsmobile Achieva vs. 2013 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2013 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Oldsmobile Achieva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Oldsmobile Achieva would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 747 kg more than 2000 Oldsmobile Achieva.
Because 2013 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Oldsmobile Achieva. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Oldsmobile Achieva has automatic transmission and 2013 Jeep Wrangler has manual transmission. 2013 Jeep Wrangler will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Oldsmobile Achieva will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Oldsmobile Achieva | 2013 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Jeep |
Model | Achieva | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2400 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 281 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 2057 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4684 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1877 mm |