2000 Oldsmobile Aurora vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 3,473 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1974 Volvo 140 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Volvo 140. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Oldsmobile Aurora | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Volvo |
Model | Aurora | 140 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3473 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 95 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2620 mm |