2000 Oldsmobile Aurora vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 3,473 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora weights approximately 564 kg more than 1995 Rover 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora has automatic transmission and 1995 Rover 200 has manual transmission. 1995 Rover 200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Oldsmobile Aurora | 1995 Rover 200 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Rover |
Model | Aurora | 200 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3473 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 144 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1644 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2510 mm |