2000 Oldsmobile Aurora vs. 2003 Pagani Zonda

To start off, 2003 Pagani Zonda is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora would be higher. At 7,010 cc (12 cylinders), 2003 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora weights approximately 394 kg more than 2003 Pagani Zonda.

Because 2003 Pagani Zonda is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Pagani Zonda. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora has automatic transmission and 2003 Pagani Zonda has manual transmission. 2003 Pagani Zonda will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Oldsmobile Aurora 2003 Pagani Zonda
Make Oldsmobile Pagani
Model Aurora Zonda
Year Released 2000 2003
Body Type Sedan Convertible
Engine Position Front Middle
Engine Size 3473 cc 7010 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 12 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 0 HP 542 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1644 kg 1250 kg
Vehicle Length 5230 mm 4395 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 2055 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1151 mm
Wheelbase Size 2900 mm 2730 mm