2000 Oldsmobile Profile vs. 1962 Oldsmobile Jetfire
To start off, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Oldsmobile Jetfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Oldsmobile Jetfire would be higher. At 3,531 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Oldsmobile Jetfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Oldsmobile Jetfire (215 HP) has 9 more horse power than 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. (206 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Oldsmobile Jetfire should accelerate faster than 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Oldsmobile Profile weights approximately 263 kg more than 1962 Oldsmobile Jetfire.
Because 2000 Oldsmobile Profile is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Oldsmobile Jetfire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Oldsmobile Jetfire (408 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. (353 Nm). This means 1962 Oldsmobile Jetfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Oldsmobile Profile.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Oldsmobile Profile | 1962 Oldsmobile Jetfire | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Profile | Jetfire |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 3531 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 206 HP | 215 HP |
| Torque | 353 Nm | 408 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1297 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2850 mm |
