2000 Oldsmobile Profile vs. 1995 Rover 200

To start off, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile Profile is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile (206 HP) has 104 more horse power than 1995 Rover 200. (102 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Oldsmobile Profile weights approximately 485 kg more than 1995 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Oldsmobile Profile is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Rover 200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile (353 Nm) has 226 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 200. (127 Nm). This means 2000 Oldsmobile Profile will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 200. 2000 Oldsmobile Profile has automatic transmission and 1995 Rover 200 has manual transmission. 1995 Rover 200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Oldsmobile Profile will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: