2000 Oldsmobile Profile vs. 2002 Audi A6
To start off, 2002 Audi A6 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Oldsmobile Profile would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile Profile is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi A6 (247 HP) has 41 more horse power than 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. (206 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Audi A6 weights approximately 190 kg more than 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile (353 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Audi A6. (350 Nm). This means 2000 Oldsmobile Profile will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Oldsmobile Profile | 2002 Audi A6 | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Audi |
| Model | Profile | A6 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 2671 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 5 valves |
| Horse Power | 206 HP | 247 HP |
| Torque | 353 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2850 mm |
