2000 Oldsmobile Profile vs. 2004 Nissan Terrano II
To start off, 2004 Nissan Terrano II is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Oldsmobile Profile would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile Profile is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile (206 HP) has 90 more horse power than 2004 Nissan Terrano II. (116 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile should accelerate faster than 2004 Nissan Terrano II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Terrano II weights approximately 65 kg more than 2000 Oldsmobile Profile.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile (353 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Nissan Terrano II. (197 Nm). This means 2000 Oldsmobile Profile will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Nissan Terrano II.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Oldsmobile Profile | 2004 Nissan Terrano II | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Nissan |
| Model | Profile | Terrano II |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 2388 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 206 HP | 116 HP |
| Torque | 353 Nm | 197 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1625 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2660 mm |
