2000 Oldsmobile Profile vs. 2010 Holden UTE

To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Oldsmobile Profile would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (281 HP) has 75 more horse power than 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. (206 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2000 Oldsmobile Profile.

Because 2000 Oldsmobile Profile is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile (353 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden UTE. (350 Nm). This means 2000 Oldsmobile Profile will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden UTE. 2000 Oldsmobile Profile has automatic transmission and 2010 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2010 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Oldsmobile Profile will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: