2000 Oldsmobile Profile vs. 2013 BMW X6 M
To start off, 2013 BMW X6 M is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Oldsmobile Profile would be higher. At 4,395 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 BMW X6 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 BMW X6 M (547 HP) has 341 more horse power than 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. (206 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 BMW X6 M should accelerate faster than 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 BMW X6 M weights approximately 855 kg more than 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 BMW X6 M (678 Nm) has 325 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. (353 Nm). This means 2013 BMW X6 M will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Oldsmobile Profile.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Oldsmobile Profile | 2013 BMW X6 M | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | BMW |
| Model | Profile | X6 M |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 4395 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 206 HP | 547 HP |
| Torque | 353 Nm | 678 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 2415 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4876 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2933 mm |
