2000 Oldsmobile Recon vs. 2013 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 2013 Toyota Corolla is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Oldsmobile Recon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Oldsmobile Recon would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile Recon is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Oldsmobile Recon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Toyota Corolla. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Recon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Oldsmobile Recon | 2013 Toyota Corolla | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Toyota |
| Model | Recon | Corolla |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 130 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 4-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 50 L |
