2000 Oldsmobile Recon vs. 2013 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC90 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Oldsmobile Recon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Oldsmobile Recon would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Oldsmobile Recon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Volvo XC90. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Recon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Oldsmobile Recon has automatic transmission and 2013 Volvo XC90 has manual transmission. 2013 Volvo XC90 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Oldsmobile Recon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Oldsmobile Recon | 2013 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Volvo |
| Model | Recon | XC90 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 237 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2857 mm |
