2000 Oldsmobile SS vs. 1967 Opel Commodore
To start off, 2000 Oldsmobile SS is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Opel Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Opel Commodore would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Oldsmobile SS (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1967 Opel Commodore. (94 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 1967 Opel Commodore.
Because 1967 Opel Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Opel Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile SS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Oldsmobile SS (318 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Opel Commodore. (157 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2000 Oldsmobile SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Opel Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Oldsmobile SS | 1967 Opel Commodore | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Opel |
Model | SS | Commodore |
Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2239 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 318 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1760 mm |