2000 Oldsmobile SS vs. 1985 Renault 18
To start off, 2000 Oldsmobile SS is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Renault 18. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Renault 18 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Oldsmobile SS (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1985 Renault 18. (63 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 1985 Renault 18.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Oldsmobile SS (318 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Renault 18. (103 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Oldsmobile SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Renault 18. 2000 Oldsmobile SS has automatic transmission and 1985 Renault 18 has manual transmission. 1985 Renault 18 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Oldsmobile SS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Oldsmobile SS | 1985 Renault 18 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Renault |
Model | SS | 18 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1395 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 318 Nm | 103 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1710 mm |