2000 Opel Corsa vs. 1963 ZAZ Jalta
To start off, 2000 Opel Corsa is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 ZAZ Jalta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 ZAZ Jalta would be higher. At 1,389 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Opel Corsa is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1963 ZAZ Jalta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 ZAZ Jalta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Opel Corsa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Opel Corsa (104 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 ZAZ Jalta. (44 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2000 Opel Corsa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 ZAZ Jalta.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Opel Corsa | 1963 ZAZ Jalta | |
Make | Opel | ZAZ |
Model | Corsa | Jalta |
Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1389 cc | 748 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 23 HP |
Torque | 104 Nm | 44 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2030 mm |