2000 Opel Corsa vs. 1965 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2000 Opel Corsa is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 1,389 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Opel Corsa is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1965 ZAZ 966 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 ZAZ 966. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Opel Corsa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Opel Corsa (104 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2000 Opel Corsa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Opel Corsa | 1965 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | Opel | ZAZ |
Model | Corsa | 966 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1389 cc | 887 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 27 HP |
Torque | 104 Nm | 52 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2170 mm |