2000 Opel Corsa vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Opel Corsa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Opel Corsa would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (268 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 204 more horse power than 2000 Opel Corsa. (64 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 2000 Opel Corsa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ATS weights approximately 665 kg more than 2000 Opel Corsa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac ATS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac ATS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Opel Corsa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ATS (353 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 241 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Opel Corsa. (112 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac ATS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Opel Corsa. 2013 Cadillac ATS has automatic transmission and 2000 Opel Corsa has manual transmission. 2000 Opel Corsa will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac ATS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Opel Corsa | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
Make | Opel | Cadillac |
Model | Corsa | ATS |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 112 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72.5 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.6 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 9.5 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 865 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4643 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.2 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 8.2 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 61 L |