2000 Opel Omega vs. 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4
To start off, 2000 Opel Omega is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4 would be higher. At 3,175 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Opel Omega (218 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4. (104 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Opel Omega weights approximately 695 kg more than 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Opel Omega | 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4 | |
| Make | Opel | Triumph |
| Model | Omega | Dove GTR4 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3175 cc | 2138 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 218 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 53 L |
