2000 Opel Omega vs. 1992 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2000 Opel Omega is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Opel Omega (305 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 196 more horse power than 1992 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Ranger.
Because 1992 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Opel Omega. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Opel Omega | 1992 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Opel | Ford |
| Model | Omega | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5666 cc | 2298 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
