2000 Opel Omega vs. 2004 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2004 Subaru Outback is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Opel Omega would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Opel Omega (305 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 2004 Subaru Outback. (212 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 2004 Subaru Outback. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Subaru Outback weights approximately 375 kg more than 2000 Opel Omega.
Because 2004 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Opel Omega. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Opel Omega (450 Nm) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Subaru Outback. (285 Nm). This means 2000 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Subaru Outback.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Opel Omega | 2004 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Opel | Subaru |
| Model | Omega | Outback |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5666 cc | 2999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | boxer |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 212 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 450 Nm | 285 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1685 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 64 L |
