2000 Opel Omega vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Opel Omega would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2000 Opel Omega. (218 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2000 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 210 kg more than 2000 Opel Omega. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Opel Omega. (290 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Opel Omega | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Opel | Toyota |
| Model | Omega | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3175 cc | 3950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 218 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 382 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 1920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.9 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 87 L |
