2000 Opel Omega vs. 2011 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2011 Volvo XC70 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Opel Omega would be higher. At 3,175 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo XC70 weights approximately 170 kg more than 2000 Opel Omega.
Because 2011 Volvo XC70 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Opel Omega. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo XC70 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Opel Omega | 2011 Volvo XC70 | |
Make | Opel | Volvo |
Model | Omega | XC70 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3175 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 218 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 1880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4838 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1862 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1604 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2815 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.9 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 70 L |