2000 Opel Omega vs. 2012 Suzuki Equator

To start off, 2012 Suzuki Equator is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Suzuki Equator (152 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2000 Opel Omega. (135 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 2000 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Opel Omega weights approximately 655 kg more than 2012 Suzuki Equator.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Suzuki Equator (232 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Opel Omega. (185 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Suzuki Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Opel Omega.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Opel Omega 2012 Suzuki Equator
Make Opel Suzuki
Model Omega Equator
Year Released 2000 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 2488 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 135 HP 152 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 185 Nm 232 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1630 kg 975 kg
Vehicle Length 4900 mm 5250 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1510 mm 1750 mm
Wheelbase Size 2740 mm 3200 mm