2000 Pagani Zonda vs. 1981 Mazda 626
To start off, 2000 Pagani Zonda is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 5,987 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Pagani Zonda weights approximately 205 kg more than 1981 Mazda 626.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1981 Mazda 626 has automatic transmission and 2000 Pagani Zonda has manual transmission. 2000 Pagani Zonda will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1981 Mazda 626 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Pagani Zonda | 1981 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Pagani | Mazda |
| Model | Zonda | 626 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5987 cc | 1584 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 389 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1045 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4395 mm | 4310 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2055 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1151 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2520 mm |
